There was something vaguely comical about the sight earlier this month of barristers in full wig and gown waving placards outside the Old Bailey during their not-strike over legal aid cuts. The sight was vaguely comical, yes, but the issue they were protesting against is anything but. Legal aid in criminal cases has been a cornerstone of the justice system for many years. It is axiomatic that anyone accused of a serious offence must have the opportunity to defend themselves. That opportunity, unfortunately, has to go hand-in-hand with the wherewithal. In a system within which expertise is rewarded proportionately there has to be some way of offering the necessary funding to those who need it but don’t have it. It’s true there is the risk of some criminals being financed by the state to defend the indefensible, but the risk of the opposite is considerably greater.
Expert Witness Blog
- 14 November 2013
The much-heralded standards for experts in the family courts were unveiled simultaneously by the joint response of the MoJ and the Family Justice Council, and by Lord McNally in an address to the Bond Solon Expert Witness Conference on 8 November. There are 11 of them in all, and for a document that can have a far-reaching effect on the delivery of justice for children they seem to the lay reader to be a little vague.
The first standard, for instance, requires the expert’s area of competence to be “appropriate to the issue(s) upon which the court has identified that an opinion is required, and relevant experience is evidenced in their CV”, while the second requires them to be “active in the area of work or practice, (as a practitioner or an academic who is subject to peer appraisal), has sufficient experience of the issues relevant to the instant case, and is familiar with the breadth of current practice or opinion”.
Last Updated on Thursday, 21 November 2013 19:07
With our legal history being celebrated and our health service under threat, the Americans can still deliver a punch
- 17 October 2013
In 2015 the country will be celebrating the 800th anniversary of the signing of Magna Carta, which is claimed to have been the cornerstone of democracy and the rule of law in England. There is an organising body for the celebrations, with The Queen as Patron, and all sorts of events planned.
One such will be a ‘Global Law Summit’ – a conference to “promote Britain’s legal system around the world”.
Announcing the summit, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said: “The Global Law Summit 2015 will be a world-class conference showcasing the UK’s unrivalled legal expertise, based on a long history of freedom and justice.
“We will be working with legal professional bodies and business to champion one of the UK’s greatest exports, our legal system. The summit will also mark 800 years of the Magna Carta, a tradition that still provides the foundation for the best commercial and legal environment for business to flourish.”
Last Updated on Friday, 18 October 2013 10:28
- 01 October 2013
No matter how much the MoJ might wish it, the issue of legal aid cuts just won’t go away. It has become a bit of an albatross, with the coalition partner Lib Dems unhappy with being associated with the policy.
The Liberal Democrat Lawyers Association put forward an emergency motion to the partys conference in Glasgow which read: “No further cuts in the provision of Legal Aid and the availability of local justice should take place without ensuring that any such proposals are first properly trialled and assessed to demonstrate that there will be no adverse effect upon access to justice and the quality of legal services provided to those who require assistance by means of Legal Aid.”
That must have been pretty embarrassing for Lib Dem peer Lord McNally, who is the government minister charges with steering the implementation of the cuts (sorry, reforms) in the Lords. He, predictably, opposed the motion.
The Labour Party has been strangely quiet on the issue, with only Lord Bach (@FightBach) still fighting a rearguard action.
Meanwhile Michael Mansfield’s chambers, Tooks, which is known for its championing of the underprivileged, has announced it is to dissolve and has blamed the legal aid cuts for its demise.
Its announcement of 23 September said: “The dissolution of Chambers is the direct result of government policies on Legal Aid.” It added: “The government policies led by Justice Secretary Chris Grayling are cumulatively devastating the provision of legal services and threatening the rule of law.”
Other parts of the Jackson ‘reforms’ are also the subject of selective backpedalling. The judge tasked with implementing the whole package is reported to have told the Law Society Gazette he will make changes “if necessary”. In an exclusive interview with the journal he reportedly said: “We are seeing people adapting their business models to deal with the new rules. In some ways it is too early to tell, but the principle remains that we want access to justice at proportionate cost. We will look at both of those aspects to ensure that the underlying principles are coming out of the reforms.”
It’s all getting a bit messy.
• Experts from around the globe met in Sweden last week to present governments with the report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. After years of research its Working Party I produced what it said was a 95% probability that human activity was the cause of “at least 50%” of the rise in temperature over the past 150 years or so. There are still those who see that assertion as some kind of admission that they may be wrong. Presumably the planet they are living on doesn’t have any truck with climate change – they just wish it away. Science is never 100% settled; but, as Sense About Science – a charitable trust that aims to help the general public understand science – pointed out in its publication Making Sense of Uncertainty, we should be relieved when scientists describe the uncertainties in their work. In this case, 95% probability means ‘definitely’ and ‘over 50%’ means as much as can be ascertained.
Last Updated on Friday, 11 October 2013 15:58
- 22 September 2013
The ramifications of the Jackson reforms are spreading in scope and appear to have become subject to the law of unintended consequences. That is if the analysis by barrister Colm Nugent in an article for the Law Society Gazette is correct.
Mr Nugent argues that the insistence by courts on strict timetables could result in an expert witness report that is submitted after a date set by the court being ruled inadmissible and consequently result in loss to the client. That could in turn result in the expert being sued by the client under the Sale of Goods Act. At the end of his article he goes on to imply that the same principle may apply to counsel. I look forward to the relevant article.
• The activities of internet ‘trolls’ have had a number of tragic consequences in recent years – in particular where young people are concerned. Numerous cases have been reported where teenagers have had their lives ruined by the kind of nasty messages the anonymity of social networking can invoke and even journalist and MPs have been threatened and harassed by such people.
Now, however, there is an even more sinister kind of internet criminal – the online blackmailer. The awful case of Daniel Perry, who threw himself from the Tay Bridge after being targeted, has highlighted the damage these people can do. A report published by the police Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) centre cites a figure of 424 children forced to perform sex acts in front of web cams after being tricked into exposing themselves and then blackmailed. The report says 184 of the victims were British.
We are fortunate in this country to have a team of experts at CEOP, with the skills to understand and target the behaviour of child abusers; otherwise the figure could be much higher.
• Recently-published research commissioned by law firm Slater and Gordon shows that half of women who return to work after having children feel attitudes toward them had changed among their male colleagues, while a quarter felt they had suffered discrimination.
Kiran Daurka, a lawyer at Slater and Gordon said: “Despite the equality legislation in place, attitudes and working practices continue to block women in achieving their career aspirations in the UK.
“This report shows that there are still negative perceptions of women with children and this kind of attitude is short-sighted and bad for business.”
I wonder if UKIP’s Godfrey Bloom has read the report.
• In my last post I referred to the convoluted circumstances surrounding the temporary Chief Constable – formerly Deputy Chief constable – of Cumbria, Stuart Hyde. Mr Hyde has returned to his former post of Deputy Chief Constable, under a new temporary Chief Constable, formerly ‘acting’ Chief Constable, Bernard Lawson. However, as he has completed 30 years of service as a police officer, Mr Hyde will retire in December.
Last Updated on Monday, 23 September 2013 09:09
- What can coppers do when they stop coppering? And let’s hope Cumbria’s temp doesn’t need legal aid
- Young, old and the mentally ill: all are being failed in one way or another
- PI lawyers are alive and well – and in hospital
- Justice catches up with the wrongdoers, wherever they are – and whatever they are riding